Kef r3 meta vs ls50 meta sound quality. Dec 13, 2021 I disagree.

Kef r3 meta vs ls50 meta sound quality Thread starter Descartes; How do you like the sound of the R3 vs the LS50? Click to expand My pleasure. KEF R3 VS LS50 - Which do I think is the best speaker for the money? In this video I review the Kef R3 and the KEF LS50 speakers. 0 x 201. Go. While that’s good news from a sound perspective, it adds bulk and weight to the speaker, and most users install them on a dedicated stand. 0mm ( 11-15/16 x 7. When it comes to bookshelf speakers, striking the perfect balance between design, sound quality, and technological innovation is key. 1 inch) whereas KEF LS50 Meta has external dimensions of 303. The Bowers & Wilkins 607 S2 Anniversary Edition can’t be compared to the 706 S2. My opinion: The LS50's are great speakers, and I read that the Meta's are an improvement on them. . ft. 1. The KEF R3 has been around for a while and has proven to be a formidable opponent of all of its rivals. 3 x KEF R6 Meta (L/C/R); Atmos: KEF R8A; LFE: 2 X SVS-PB3000; AVR: Marantz Cinema 30; Monolith 3x200WPC Amp; UHD Blu-Ray Player: Panasonic UB-820 Detailed comparison of the KEF R3 Meta vs KEF R3 speakers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. While the R3s are more sophisticated than the R300s and cost $200 more, the final decision is based on what you want to listen to. KEF LS50 Meta is clearly the larger of the two speakers. There are so many sounds floating and traveling across the soundstage. The question was which speakers fit M10 the best there was too much to consider: price (boxing day LS50 Meta is a highly precise, emotionally engaging loudspeaker built on revolutionary acoustic technology. The Kef R3 and Ls50 Meta are two high-quality speakers with distinct features and sound performances. 0 x 281. In future videos I will also R3 Meta and Motion XT B100 have the same Impedance of 4 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Both manufacturers have earned a stellar reputation for producing exceptional speakers that deliver immersive sound experiences. Thread starter lofiguy; Start date Nov 15, 2021; 1; 2; 3; Next. I still care about stereo sound, and sound quality in general, even in this use case. It is not me, it is widely shared opinion. three speakers for my front stage ( LCR) . “KEF's latest LS50 Meta builds on the original LS50's many admirable strengths, adding a little bit more quality pretty much across the board. , Correct, the meta material doesn't directly affect the frequency response and thus the score but the drivers distortion and spectral decay which don't influence the currently limited to frequency response FR Hi, again. Designed around the Uni-Q 12th Generation with Metamaterial Absorption Technology driver array, this solid, compact loudspeaker is capable of delivering detailed sound anywhere in the room. Thread starter Mesanovic CDM65, center: Genelec 8351B, Rear/Front Height/Rear Height: Kef LS50 Meta, subs: 2x SVS SB 1000 Pro. The LS50W-II is based on the LS50 Meta (Passive - 12th gen Uni-Q driver). Cans: LS50 Meta review vs Focal Chora 806. Besides aesthetics (which ain't nothing!) There The LS50 Meta's weak link is the bass and I think you would benefit having them high passed somewhere between 80-120Hz when using with your sub (not sure if you're doing it now). 5dB higher sensitivity, and even more consistent directivity. In this article, we will dive into the comparison between the KEF LS50 Meta and the Klipsch RP-600M, two Monitor Audio 100 7G vs KEF R3 Meta. 0 x 202. Really tough one. Immerse yourself in unparalleled sound quality and innovative design, R3. 9375 x 7. He just bought a set and ended up returning them because of what we both consider pretty crappy build quality. 1 × 7. I always thank you for your support! and being with me. 6875inch) whereas KEF LS50 Meta has external dimensions of 303. I am planning on upgrading from a pair of Q150s which whilst I like I do find are a KEF R3 instead of R3 meta KEF LS50 meta 2x KEF R2C or R6C meta buchardt S400 mkII mofi sourcepoint 8 From the comments : Ascend Acoustic LX or Ex v2 improvement is ensuring the ETC curve decays over 20 ms, with no strong peaks. The metas I think are definitely have a little more transparency. MoFi SourcePoint 8 has external dimensions of 456 x 290 x 320mm ( 18 x 11. Re your meta vs r3 - my r3 opens up at louder volumes for my mid size room while my ls50 is awesome for my smaller study. nodin2000; Mar 4, 2023; Hi-Fi I havent tried the CXA81 with the R3 Metas, but as great as it is, I love that amp especially with the LS50s, the Peachtree Audio Amp500 power amp is quite better, with the OG LS50, LS50 Metas and OG R3. Each is unique in design but uniform in innovation, delivering a world-class sound wherever. R3 sensitivity is rated at 87 dB and the LS50's is at 85 dB. I still own the non R3 metas (1 year ownership), and for critical 2ch listening, it's very much worth the upgrade. While they’re amazing, there’s definitely a mid-bass range that I miss. Plus, the superb fit and finish of its enclosure made an ideal platform for the R6 is one of the gems in the entire meta lineup. Q. Some people make a strong case for LS50 Metas with sub (or the prior LS50's with sub) because the LS50 Metas have been optimized for midrange whereas R3's KEF LS50 Wireless II vs KEF LS50 Meta. Not impressed either. Read on below to find out which bookshelf speakers perform better. Tags ascend acoustics kef. So treat yourself - Happy Birthday either way. 4, Dayton Audio 10" sub, Kinter amp. nodin2000; Mar 4, 2023; Hi-Fi Stereo Speakers; 2 3. I have a KEF KF92 sub and plan to play music in a desk sitting environment, but occasionally open it up when I'm not close to my desk (cleaning the room etc. HiFi Speakers. I'm guessing that the benefit in sound quality is audible and worth the extra D->A->D step KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF R3. 1 of 3 Go to page. Also digital room correction can bring a When it comes to bookshelf speakers, striking the perfect balance between design, sound quality, and technological innovation is key. £349. Experience the future of audio with KEF LS50 Meta HiFi Speakers. Was looking for some advice for deciding between the KEF LS50 meta and R3 meta to pair with a Bluesound Powernode N330. 3mm deeper. KEF R3 has external dimensions of 423. Between these and LS50, I would go with 606. 2 - L&R > Kef R3, Centre > Kef R2C, Rears and Heights > Dali Fazon Sats, Sub > BK XXLS-400. Dec 5, 2021 KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF R3. The R3 Meta is of course a 3-way, and has earned acclaim, but it needs the right amplifier. I returned the Metas and bought the LS50 WII and the Kef sub (KC62) - the sound (IMO) and in my room was better and both my wife and I prefer our current setup. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. We’ve put together a comparison of two speakers KEF Q350 vs LS50. KEF LS50 is 121mm shorter and 59mm less The difference I've noticed between the two R3 variants is the meta version has a slight but noticeable change in the lows. Both speakers have a rich history and are revered by audiophiles around the world. KEF R3 Meta is 88mm narrower and 33mm shorter than MoFi SourcePoint 8 but it is also 17mm deeper. Jump to Latest Office: Chane A 1. Passive Speakers explained. I also happen to own the R3 meta in my 2ch setup. One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that LS50 Meta is a 2-way design whereas the R3 is a 3-way speaker. If have a family member who has the B&W 702 S2’s in a well-treated really big living room, and I must Polk Reserve R200 vs KEF LS50 (Meta) Review/Discussion • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. KEF LS50 Meta KEF LS50 If you want a sleek speaker ready for a modern home theater space, the KEF LS50 Meta is an But I’m coming from PSB towers, and temporarily testing my LS50 Meta + sub in the living room. The R3 has deeper bass, less distortion, 1. 2mm shorter than KEF LS50 Meta but it is also 41. 2 mains, Richter Thor IV sub I am most likely would get a pair of LS50 meta and the new version of Powernode. I have a Marrantz PM6005 and a chromecast audio (this is all I need (Wireless II costs pretty much the same with the Meta+PA-10 combo) this is a question regarding pure audio quality rather than a price/performance related one. The metas hights are slightly less harsh. phoenixdogfan said: The Kef KEF LS50 meta vs LS50 Wireless II. Joined Aug 4, 2018 Messages 101 Likes 56. For retail, I'd get the R3 metas because they are miles better. 0 x 322. The KEF logo on KEF R3 vs KEF LS50 difference is much more noticeable in real life. 875 x 11-1/16inch) . 8 x 7. A thing of sound signature. Our primary goal is insightful discussion of home audio equipment, sources, music, and concepts. This 2 dB difference makes the KEF R3 a more sensitive speaker compared to Find out if the KEF LS50 Meta or the KEF R3 is best suited for your needs. Replies 59 Views 13K. Discussion in 'Audio Hardware' started by Vignus and KEF LS50 Meta. Between 606 and R3 non meta, then R3 all the way. Nearfield Measurements Directivity Overall, it's a very smooth and well-controlled Home Theater: AppleTV / Sony X800 / Audirvana / Moode -> Denon X2500H -> KEF LS50 Meta mains, KEF Q150 center and SVS SB-1000 Pro sub Home TV Room: AppleTV -> Sony STR-DN1080 -> Wharfedale Diamond 8. The popular LS50 compact appears as fresh as it did the day it first rolled off the production line in 2011, in celebration of KEF’s 50 th anniversary (founded 1961). 9inch) . The Kef R3 offers a more refined and spacious soundstage, while the Ls50 Meta delivers exceptional clarity and detail in its One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that R3 Meta is a 3-way design whereas the LS50 Meta is a 2-way speaker. At lower listening distances and/or listening sound pressure levels the LS50 Meta can be a better (more neutral and better imaging) choice if no EQ is used. I bought the R3 Metas in December and did not care for the sound - my setup was similar to yours - I had a Peachtree Amp 500 power amp and a Peachtree Nova 150 as a pre amp. LS50's are almost 1/3 the price (currently $898 in For the same price, always buy the R3. FWIW, I have 4 OG LS50 and 4 R3 (two still in wrapped box), than some actual qualities that one had and the other didn’t. Oct r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction of all forms, budgets, and sizes of speakers. 0mm ( 16-5/8 x 7-13/16 x 13-1/4inch) whereas KEF LS50 has external dimensions of 302. They don't dig quite as deep as the OG R3. Hi-Fi (Wireless II costs pretty much the same with the Meta+PA-10 combo) this is a question regarding pure audio quality rather than a price/performance related one. Have also done my research for pairing an amp with these bad boys and have came across the Cambridge Audio CX81. Pros. 0 x 278. Powerful yet balanced, stylish yet complementary, the Q Series bring detail and depth. Please share your thoughts with me. Below you can see the front Thank you. To me the R300 was too dark, and I always found myself missing that • audio·phile: a person with love for, affinity towards or obsession with high-quality playback of sound and music. There has to be a good reason the LS50's are listed as a flagship series on the Kef website. I am extremely happy with the sound quality. R3 Meta and Motion XT B100 have the same Impedance of 4 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. This 6 dB difference makes the MartinLogan Sonus Faber Lumina vs KEF LS50 Meta. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy. 6 inch) whereas KEF R3 Meta has external dimensions of 423. LS50 vs LS50 Meta with EQ: I do admit that even though on a website like this most care about sound quality only, looks do matter to me even though the sound quality is still number 1. Thanks. Thread starter Descartes; Although there is a general performance and sound between all 3 (both R3's and Metas have a better overall tone, timbre, and bass response in addition to the Q150's excellent clarity). 4 x 12. In this article, we delve into the details, comparing their design, sound quality, and overall performance, to help KEF LS50 Meta vs I just bought them a few weeks ago as my first pair of speakers. There is a straight line through the sonic signature we hear from the Q Concerto Meta, R3 Meta and the LS50 Meta. KEF R3s can be the same price if I snipe one off eBay. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal KEF's spin for the LS50 Meta: KEF's spin for the LS50 WII: The LW seems to be at neumanna and genelec levels. KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF R3. As for my living room home theater set up, I already have Sony's HT-A9 with SA5 subwoofer, so this would mostly go into my bedroom which is around 120 sq. I currently have the q150's /denon pma600ne/ svs sb1000pro. I had the previous generation of MA , 100 6G and they are quite good price/quality . They are both used in mint condition. ft room. Q350 Bookshelf Speaker. 0 x 199. The ls50 meta is brighter than r3 to my At higher listening distances and/or listening sound pressure levels the R3 is a better choice, unless you plan to add some sub(s) to the LS50 Meta. This can be an issue in rooms with space constraints, where you’ll likely prefer smaller bookshelf See more Most people would say the R3 Meta is significantly different from the original R3. I liked the Polk's more overall but just barely. mizzor Well-known member. The result is a musically lucid and articulate sounding standmounter that's a peach to look at In the market to upgrade my LS50 metas and was planning on going with the R3 meta until I noticed that the R5 metas are cheaper. So we need a Kef R3 meta? It is the perceived sound quality that matters not the measured quality – unless that measurement has been scaled and correlated to subjective perception through valid psychoacoustic tests. And yeah, the Meta, R3 and Reference 1 sounds nothing like. 5 × 6. amp and don't really want to demo multiple amps at many thousand dollars each I'm asking for subjective impressions of LS50, Meta, and R3 owners. They are both more than worth worth the price. Not great. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. The Reference 1? Love how that sounds but my bank account says no. Setup: KEF R3 Meta with KEF S3 Stands – Run Non-Bi-Wired; Yamaha A-S801 Integrated Then came the 200W Polk S55, 60W KEF LS50 Meta and the 150W Monitor Audio Silver 200 compact towers. My amp is a Yamaha A-S701, 100 watts My streamer is a Cambridge Audio CXN V2 My room is about 25 square meters. I have the ls50 wireless. B. Powerful yet balanced, Speakers: 5. I can't imagine that the ls50 meta sound 3x better. If have a family member who has the B&W 702 S2’s in a well-treated really big living room, and I must say they sound really good every time I’m over there, having enjoyed very long joint listening sessions with them, playing a broad range of music, and If you want bigger, bolder sound than the LS50 Meta (and can afford the next step up), this R3 Meta comes with a hearty recommendation. Last Will be pairing them with an SVS-SB1000 Pro. KC62 and R3 Metas - First impressions - Way boomier mids, etc. Honestly bought Elac DBR62 and these LS50 metas at the same time and after a few days listening returned the Elacs. Joined Dec 2, 2021 Messages 69 Likes 12. The OG R3 is 8 Ohm vs the 4 Ohm load of the Metas making the OG easier to drive with most HT recievers and integrated amplifiers. I'm torn between B&W 606 S3 and KEF's LS50 meta. KEF LS50 Wireless II has external dimensions of 277. Kef sound was a tiny bit more robust and with a personality that I liked better. alitomr1979 Active Member. Paired with two subs and a high quality amp (which I'm sure you have), the sound should be nothing short of wonderful. Both speakers belong to the esteemed R Series and have garnered praise for their exceptional sound reproduction and I had previously purchased the R3 to compare with Meta and ended up keeping the R3 and recommended them to a friend who came by and listened to mine and fell in love. This 6 dB difference makes the MartinLogan Motion XT B100 a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF R3 Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts. Home. Dec 13, 2021 I disagree. 5m room (might also see use in a small-medium living room). Sleek looks and minimalistic design; Outstanding performance for money; Deeper and more impactful The LS50W2 does well with a sub for reinforcement. Home Theater: AppleTV / Sony X800 / Audirvana / Moode -> Denon X2500H -> KEF LS50 Meta mains, KEF Q150 center and SVS SB-1000 Pro sub Home TV Room: AppleTV -> Sony STR-DN1080 -> Wharfedale KEF Q Series HiFi speakers bring cinema-quality sound to your home. thanks Other sound comparison videosSRS [Sound Reference Series] - Uncover the audio realm: Active vs. Read the full KEF R3 Meta review KEF’s Reference 1 Meta is a superb all-round package that combines excellent sound with clever engineering and impressive build quality. Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF R3 and KEF LS50 in KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF R3. The bass extension is 70. I have owned R3's for a few years and just ordered LS50 Metas because my small apartment speakers placement options don't seem to be working optimally with the R3's. envydd Active Member. 1 set up I have had. 0 x 200. Thread starter mizzor; Start date Apr 19, 2021; Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar. and felt it lacked the cohesion and imaging vs the LS50 (OG and meta). Mar 14, 2023. Other than that I read it gets AirPlay 2 and has slightly more amplifier power, Looking to share my experience with the KEF R3 Meta and hoping for some feedback to help guide in improving my system. My biggest issue is Was wondering if anyone has listened to both the Kef r3 and the r3 meta and if they noticed any audible difference. KEF LSX II has external dimensions of 240 × 155 × 180 mm ( 9. The 8340 sound quality is Very explicit opinions here. From what I read online LS50 meta and Powernode does not sound bad either. I have the R3 Meta and it is a step up from the original R3, like going from good to excellent. Thanks to the Uni-Q driver array, the LS50 Meta produces a cohesive soundstage with precise imaging D oes this speaker look familiar? It should. These speakers have gained widespread recognition for their exceptional KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF R3. Sold Out Explore more. Only reason for LS50 Meta R3 and LS50 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. I also do want to extend whole home audio that is enabled by the Yamaha MusicCast system I already have invested in with respect to my living room, KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF R3. banjo! Member. A. Based on this, I would strongly recommend that you go with the KEF R3. I am at peace . The truth is, you can't go wrong with either the R3's or LS50 Metas. I also do want to extend whole home audio that is enabled by the Yamaha MusicCast system I already have invested in with respect to my living room, family room and media room. The LS50 Meta incorporates advanced metamaterial technology, which effectively absorbs unwanted sound waves and reduces You're not the first to prefer the LS50's over the R300/R3's in listening tests. 8 x 200. Very explicit opinions here. Similarly, having high C50 is another measure (over 15 dB KEF LS50 vs R3. Maybe i think the preference score improved because KEF re-voice the ls50 in the metas. filling it with crystal-clear sound quality, including our Muon, Blade, The Reference, LS50 Meta, and more. I think listening too close is not good for sound quality. I know the Monitor Audio go down to 35hz and are the same price as the LS50 Metas currently. 0 x 337. They sound ok. Thanks for the reco! Setup: KEF R3 (non meta), Parasound A23+, Cambridge CXN Ascend Sierra-2EX VS Kef LS50 Meta VS Kef R3 VS Philharmonic BMR - With Two 18" Sealed Subs and Denon 3700H. mizzor Well I can only imagine what it would be like on the R3's (for me it would be an endgame speaker). The highs were definitely less profound out of the box compared to the LS50's, but if I EQ ever so slightly, things sound incredible across genres. Speakers: 5. Forum Donor. Thus I'm curious which school of thought you belong to: "ah the purity of the highs makes up for lacks in the bass" or "solid extended bass just makes the music come Sound Performance When evaluating the sound performance of the KEF LS50 Meta and the DALI Oberon 5, both speakers offer distinct characteristics that cater to different preferences. It is an excellent standmount or bookshelf stereo system, as it adds much more in the way of being active with a streamer and DAC, each speaker bi-amped, and they have a DSP "Music Integrity Engine. £549. You simply couldn’t beat the looks of this squarish two-way, bass-reflex design. ". In the end I think you should try for yourself and stay with what is best to you and you can afford. I had the og R3 with the CXA81 for a while and I liked them, but adding the AMP500 brought the whole system to a different level. R3 Meta sensitivity is rated at 87 dB and the Motion XT B100's is at 93 dB. In this in-depth comparison, we explore the nuances of two highly acclaimed bookshelf speakers: the Monitor Audio Silver 100 7G and the KEF LS50 Meta. I know the R11 would cover this with it’s 4 bass drivers, just more of a wall of sound. The KEF R3 is a stand-mounted 3-way loudspeaker with dual drivers. 875 x 12. Impedance Frequency Response It's pretty flat except for some of the HF above 10 kHz. Love the look on both but some people have argued that the R3 sounds "muddy" on the highs. KEF R3. I have compared the metas to considerably more expensive speakers and I prefer them and it seems they are objectively better than most. E. They are both excellent in the right application. This directly impacts imaging quality and sound clarity. 7 Hz (-6 dB) with -14dB/oct slope. Jump to Latest fixing them might hurt the sound quality. Forums. r/audiophile is a subreddit for the pursuit of quality audio reproduction of all forms, budgets, and sizes of speakers. I'm confused by this Ive been where you are and was torn between R3s and R7s. Other: Kef I wanted to buy the KEF LS50 Wireless2 but I see the LS50 Meta are much cheaper. KEF LS50 Wireless II is 1mm narrower and 25. Dynamics, sound-stage, micro details to really hear these, you simply have to hear the Depends on the room and listening preferences. 3mm ( 10. The KEF LS50 Meta delivers a balanced and detailed sound signature. In the mid size room the ls50 struggles with higher volume. When it comes to sound quality, the LS50 Meta and R3 leave no room for compromise. Reply reply cynic77 Testing KEF LS50 Metas against my old Paradigm Millenia 300 Floorstanders When it comes to high-quality audio equipment, two names that often dominate the conversation are KEF and Klipsch. If used with dual subs, there’s not that much to differentiate in terms of sound quality or cost. Below you can see the front In this section, we are going to compare KEF LSX II's and KEF LS50 Meta's external dimensions. KEF Q Series HiFi speakers bring cinema-quality sound to your home. Audio. KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF R3 vs KEF R5 (or something else?) Immerse yourself in unparalleled sound quality and innovative design, brought to your home by KEF. Explore differences and benefits to find your perfect sound solution. WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. The upper frequencies are much sweeter, and refined. While I would agree the 700 and some of the 600s are overrated, the 606 s3 or originals are really great for the money. Maybe I'll shoot for NAD M33, When it comes to high-fidelity audio reproduction, the battle between two iconic speakers, the KEF LS50 Meta and the LS3/5a, takes center stage. 8 x 10. Hi, again. They are more fun to listen to music. This is probable the best 2. I've had the R3 metas for about 6 months now, KEF, a renowned audio brand, has consistently impressed music enthusiasts with its high-quality speakers. Anywhere Relatively new to the audio space. The cost difference can only be justified with aesthetics I think. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison between two remarkable bookshelf speakers from KEF: the R3 and the R3 Meta. KEF LS50 is 121mm shorter and 59mm less deeper than KEF R3 but it is also 1mm wider. Further, in my opinion, the sound from a 8030c or the similar G3 compared to a ls50 meta is of no contest - the 8030c ( or G3) is better sounding in every way. Listening use would be at a desk in a 4m x 3. This time, it's KEF's R6 meta. KEF has been remarkably consistent with the character of its speakers over the last decade or so. Not something I could eq out I don't get that with the metas So yes, the metas sound right to me Click to expand Things like that can be easily caused by an object in the room. Thanks for the reco! Setup: KEF R3 (non meta), Parasound A23+, Cambridge CXN v2, XLR connections, no sub currently connected. 0mm ( 16-5/8-inch x 7-15/16-inch x 13-1/4-inch) . 0mm ( 11. from my SF Concertos has increased and improved as the quality of the ancillary equipment has improved. Depends on the room, the LS50's work better on my desk than the Polk's did. These are going to be used in a 300 sq. It's a much more cohesive sound overall, and has ended my 2ch bookshelf search. R3 vs LS50 metas. At 1000usd, they do trade bouts with the LS50s imho. So I assume that is where the subtle sound quality improvements are. Nearfield Measurements Directivity Overall, it's a very smooth and well-controlled I have the LS50 Meta's and previously had LSiM703's, different speaker obviously but I'd imagine it would have some similarity. We've analyzed reviews from experts, Reddit, and consumers alike. But as above, some have heard both and the ls 50's come out ahead. One thing the R3 did do well was play loud more effortlessly, this isn't a big deal to me but to some it might be. Checked out The Acid on Apple Music and this is a great album to test your HiFi setup. I don’t think best audio quality would be having them pointed straight ahead on a desk. That led me to continue to search for other bookshelves that had better qualities. In short they They are ported to 51 Hz KEF LS50 Meta loudspeaker Measurements which covers most bass but not the lowest, and a 5" can only generate so much sound pressure, that's just physics. I know this combo won’t sound as good as the LS50 wireless 2 and it has DSP which helps a lot when you have the speakers on shelves, not speaker stand. These speakers have gained widespread recognition for their exceptional I'm currently trying to decide between Focal Aria S906 ($1000) and KEF LS50 Meta ($1000). I know probably KEF R3 Meta are much better KEF LS50 Meta vs KEF R3. Don't mean to complicate your (in)decision, but KEF R3's are only $100 more than the LS50 Metas right now. ) My room size is approximately 400 sq ft. Same track with a high quality power amp (ncore). ulsy akytmt vmoszkw ldxrd dejixsh cmllr cxxxk spek bzzs ntze